Order via email and use code XM888888 to enjoy 15% off your purchase

Household & E‑commerce Case Study: Essex MoveCo Standardizes Moving Box Printing with Flexographic on Corrugated

"We kept asking, where can i purchase moving boxes that look consistent week to week?" recalls Laura, Operations Lead at Essex MoveCo. "Our answer turned into a process discussion rather than a simple vendor list." Within that conversation, **papermart** came up early—and ultimately stayed in the mix.

Essex MoveCo serves both household relocations and small e‑commerce brands across the UK, with a large share in the regional "moving boxes essex" market. Their packaging needs are unglamorous but unforgiving: corrugated board, sturdy structures, clear print, and the stamina to hold up through storage and transport.

From the first interview, it was clear the issue wasn’t just supply. It was print consistency, color control, and predictable changeovers. "Boxes don’t win awards," Laura jokes, "but they do need to look the same every time."

Company Overview and History

Essex MoveCo started in a single warehouse near Chelmsford, then expanded into a three‑site operation serving domestic moves and micro‑brands shipping locally. On a typical week, they pack roughly 7,500–8,500 corrugated boxes for household kits and e‑commerce order bundles. The printed panels must be legible, scuff‑resistant, and aligned with brand guidelines—nothing fancy, but with very little room for drift.

Before the shift, graphics came from multiple sources: a mix of litho‑lam for premium SKUs and outsourced flexo for standard lines. Schedules slipped, colors wandered, and the team had little leverage over process control. Compliance wasn’t the problem—they already followed FSC sourcing and BRCGS PM—but repeatability was. "We needed a common print language," says their print supervisor, "and a way to measure it."

Let me back up for a moment. Essex MoveCo didn’t set out to build a showpiece. They wanted practical: corrugated board that prints predictably, changes over without drama, and lands in inventory on time for weekend moves. That’s the backdrop for everything that follows.

Quality and Consistency Issues

The core complaint? Color drift and registration on corrugated panels. In some weeks, ΔE hovered around 3–4 across brand colors—noticeable on shelf and in customer photos. FPY sat near 82–86%, and the team logged waste in the 7–9% range. Using Water-based Ink helped with compliance and handling, but viscosity swings and board moisture complicated the picture. Spot Varnishing for scuff resistance brought benefits but introduced another variable.

Here's where it gets interesting: corrugated isn’t flat. Board caliper variations and flute profiles magnify any setup wobble. Registration errors weren’t catastrophic, but they stacked up: a logo shifted a millimeter, a caution icon blurred, a QR got soft. "One box is fine; a pallet looks messy," the supervisor says. Flexographic Printing was already familiar, yet the process needed stricter control—anilox selection, pH management, and speed ranges that fit the board.

Changeovers also told a story. Slotting new SKUs meant 28–32 minutes of shims, washups, and dial‑in. "Not terrible," the team admits, "but it nudged our window." With more micro‑brands joining their roster, those swaps only got more frequent. This wasn’t a catastrophe. It was a thousand paper cuts.

Solution Design and Configuration

The team settled on Flexographic Printing for corrugated with tight process guardrails: anilox around 400–500 LPI for linework, Water-based Ink tuned for pH and viscosity control, and ΔE targets under 2.0 on brand primaries. ISO 12647 color processes and G7 calibration added a consistent baseline. Die-Cutting and Gluing remained standard, while a matte Varnishing option handled scuffing. For structure, EB‑flute board took heavy kits; B‑flute supported mid-weight folding moving boxes destined for e‑commerce shipments.

We ran a quick Q&A during commissioning:
Q: "We asked ourselves, where can i purchase moving boxes in steady volumes without babysitting quality?"
A: "We moved ordering to a portal with papermart login; our ops team checks stock and SKUs daily. It sounds trivial, but the single source helps us control color references and dielines."
Q: "What about seasonal kits and gifting?"
A: "We trialed papermart gift boxes for holiday bundles—same flexo approach, but a softer coating for presentation. Different job, same control mindset."

Fast forward six months. ΔE on primaries sits around 1.5–2.0, FPY trends near 93–95%, and waste lands in the 4–5% range. Throughput averages 9,500–10,500 boxes per day across lines, with changeovers in the 18–22 minute window. ppm defects are now in the 400–600 range versus earlier 900–1,100. Payback Period? The team estimates 10–14 months, depending on SKU mix. There were stumbles—ink viscosity drift on humid days and a board batch with uneven moisture—but the process held up with tighter checks. "It’s not a magic switch," Laura notes. "It’s discipline." And yes, the ordering and artwork handoffs still route through **papermart**; the team likes having one playbook for dielines, coatings, and those folding moving boxes that go out every Friday.

Leave a Reply